8 ms·
The Full Walter Isaacson/Steve Jobs Interview From 60 Minutes
- bgramer 15y agoIt's great that CBS put this online for everyone to view, but I really wish they added captions/subtitles to the video clips. If it's hard to do, why not just add a text transcript so that deaf people like me can understand what's being said?
- willifred 15y agoYour wish has been granted. There's a full text transcript here: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-20124391/steve-jobs-revelations-from-a-tech-giant/ http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-20124391/steve-jobs-re...
- bgramer 15y agoThank you so much for this great find! I really appreciate it.
- js2 15y agoSigh, Videos require Flash.
- andrewpi 15y agoHere are the official CBS YouTube links for those that prefer that method: One: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jqSK8Qv4ZY&feature=channel_video_title http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jqSK8Qv4ZY&feature=chann... Two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXcfDN6L9d8&feature=channel_video_title http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXcfDN6L9d8&feature=chann...
- davidmathers 15y agoThree: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7385608n http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7385608n
- lichengcai 15y agoThanks you, very useful!
- DonnyV 15y agoWhat I get from this interview is that Steve Jobs was a self centered control freak. That eventually died because of it. Not sure why anyone worships this man.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- davidcollantes 15y agoWhy anyone worships Jesus, or a god? Are you sure of that? Note: I do not worship Jobs, just pointing out the --rather-- obvious.
- adrianwaj 15y agoNote for hackers: your hero was a non-technical co-founder.
- adgar 15y agoFew hackers - by which I assume you mean engineers or developers - consider Steve Jobs a "hero." Most would agree he created wonderful products that changed the world, but he isn't much of a hero to a software or hardware hacker. Because as you note, he wasn't technical. Woz is the geek god of the two, because he was building cheap, full fucking computers in a damn garage, by himself. Dennis Ritchie was a hero. Not Steve Jobs. If anything, hackers are more likely than most to respond negatively to Steve's recent approach toward mobile platforms and use of IP in business... which are the sorts of alienating decisions a technical co-founder can make. If by "hackers" you meant "people who want to make product(s) for a startup and learned a few things about code to hack out a prototype," you might be more on-target.
- GHFigs 15y agoMore and more it seems like "hacker" is a religious or ideological term and not an occupational description.
- codex 15y agoI might be hauled before the Politcal Committee for the Advancement of the Revolution for saying this, but please speak for yourself. I am a hacker and by boyhood hero was Steve. He was an artist whose medium was technology. It doesn't get more hacker-like than that to me.
- adgar 15y ago> I am a hacker and by boyhood hero was Steve. He was an artist whose medium was technology. It doesn't get more hacker-like than that to me. This is why I predicated my post on the definition of "hacker." If we're going with the 2011, mainstream meaning of the word, where CEOs can be hackers because they help create amazing technology, then I have no input. Go ahead and hack your life, make some awesome music by hacking your violin, hack whatever you like.
- 6ren 15y agoWe specifically picked you out. Awesome parents.
- cantbecool 15y agoThat episode of 60 Minutes was fantastic, and the audio from Walter's interviews with Jobs was surprising. The best part of the program was the fact that Steve Jobs actually met his biological father years before knowing who his biological father truly was.
- baddox 15y agoCould that video player have been any worse? To click the fullscreen button, you literally have to click on the darkened pixels of the icon. It's not a rectangular click area.
- Steko 15y agoNot to rain on Walter Isaacson's parade as he sells more copies of this then all biographies combined over the last 10+ years* but when asking Steve about how he didn't care about money that might have been a great time for a professional journalist (head of CNN, Time) to follow up and ask why he cheated Woz out of a few hundred dollars on Breakout (or Kottke, I'm sure there are others). I haven't read the book yet so he maybe he does and there are some obvious answers (like "that was a mistake and part of why I later rejected my wealth") but that question really should have been asked. * Mao and Jesus not included. Go crazy with that, Apple haters.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- mahyarm 15y agoJust like after a certain point, money doesn't make you happier, but before that point it makes you more happier, I think Steve was at a point in his finances that more money would make him happier. That set point is usually what gives you a comfortable life, transportation, a private space you can call your own and the reasonable ability to buy what you need, and security that you'll always be able to have that. A nice upper middle class life style basically.
- kitsune_ 15y agoWell, that is true with almost everyone. It doesn't lead many people to cheat on their business partners however.
- ghshephard 15y agoIssacson puts that question directly to a number of people in the book, including Steve Jobs - Jobs claims not to remember having shorted Woz on the bonus. At the time, Jobs likely needed the money for a trip to All One Farm to help prepare for the apple harvest. I think Woz summarized it best: "Jobs is a complex person and being manipulative is just the darker facet of the traits that make him successful"
- 15y ago
- hopeless 15y agoI'm not familiar with the "60 Minutes" programme, but is there really only 28mins of content? (15min + 13min videos)
- blinkingled 15y agoI am 16% into my Kindle copy of the biography and so far the only thing that has bugged me is how cold Steve was with Daniel Kottke. He just flat out refused giving him any stock and seemed to discourage others too when they tried giving part of their own stock. I could understand why he might not have given Wozniak the bonus - at least he gave half of the rest and may be he needed money badly. But the Kottke thing is just unexplainable. Wozniak finally ended up giving some of his options to many other neglected ones including Kottke. The book is definitely worth a read just in case anyone was still on the fence.