3 ms·
> Which is also patently false, by the way. Criminals in Germany usually don't have guns. Um, that doesn't invalidate "If you outlaw guns only outlaws will hav
by wyldfire 4y ago
> Which is also patently false, by the way. Criminals in Germany usually don't have guns.
Um, that doesn't invalidate "If you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns".
∀ gun-holder | gun-holder ∈ criminals
But you're suggesting that:
∃ criminal | criminal ∉ gun-holder
... and that is not in conflict with the above. Your evidence only invalidates:
∀ criminal | criminal ∈ gun-holder
... which no one has claimed.
BTW in general I think we should have some saner restrictions on firearms in the US even if we have to amend the BOR to do it. But I will concede that the abundance of legal firearms will be challenging to suddenly prohibit and could certainly flourish among criminals. I'd like to consider your argument but "Criminals in Germany usually don't have guns" doesn't help much.