6 ms·
They also seem to believe the speed of an exploit is relevant enough to put it in the headline and repeat it several times in th article.
by joe_guy 4y ago
They also seem to believe the speed of an exploit is relevant enough to put it in the headline and repeat it several times in th article.
- samhw 4y agoAlso, eight seconds sounds like a terrifically long time for it to take effect. That's tens of billions of CPU cycles, billions of arithmetic instructions, millions of disk seeks, a hundred or so page loads, a dozen "knock knock" jokes in call-and-response between London and Sydney. How non-technical does one have to be to think "eight seconds" is fast in computer time?!
- londons_explore 4y agoTo me, 8 seconds implies 'it probably needs loads of heap grooming, and even then is probably only 90% reliable'