3 ms·
Read what the Dutch cycling union has to say about helmets. https://www.fietsersbond.nl/de-fiets/accessoires/fietshelmen/waarom-de-fietsersbond-tegen-een-helmp
by AndyMcConachie 4y ago
Read what the Dutch cycling union has to say about helmets.
https://www.fietsersbond.nl/de-fiets/accessoires/fietshelmen/waarom-de-fietsersbond-tegen-een-helmplicht-is/ https://www.fietsersbond.nl/de-fiets/accessoires/fietshelmen...
https://www-fietsersbond-nl.translate.goog/de-fiets/accessoires/fietshelmen/waarom-de-fietsersbond-tegen-een-helmplicht-is/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp https://www-fietsersbond-nl.translate.goog/de-fiets/accessoi...
I live here and I'll say that almost all bicycle delivery drivers where helmets in NL. Lost of riders wear helmets here, but I agree that most people just riding to work or going shopping do not.
I will also note that probably the largest bicycle delivery service in NL has helmets for sale for its riders.
https://shop.thuisbezorgd.nl/nl/helmen https://shop.thuisbezorgd.nl/nl/helmen
- amscanne 4y agoThat page is about the idea of helmet mandates, not about the safety of an individual decision to wear one. I think people most on the thread understand that there are negative consequences to mandates. The question is about whether you as a rational individual should choose to wear one. I think the answer to that is an irrefutable yes, if you want to reduce your risk of catastrophic head injury. But that doesn’t mean it should be mandated. We take calculated risks all the time, and the law can’t know all the variables and circumstances for each person at each moment. The mandate is ineffective because the most important safety factor for bicycles is frequency of cycling — the more bikes there are on the road, the more everyone is aware of them. But if you still had all those cyclists and put helmets on them, they would be slightly safer.