4 ms·
Exactly what I think as well. This might lower risk for the customers because driver may take less risk without a helmet in some situation but the risk for dri
by searchableguy 4y ago
Exactly what I think as well.
This might lower risk for the customers because driver may take less risk without a helmet in some situation but the risk for driver is only increased.
This is optimizing for customers at the cost of drivers.
I don't see any supportive extensive research linked from them .
- shrimpx 4y agoHow is it optimizing for customers, when customers don’t wear helmets either?
- robbrown451 4y agoBecause the crashes are less likely when the driver is not wearing a helmet. This is sort of the point of the article.
- shrimpx 4y agoSorry I wasn't clear. How is it optimizing for customers at the cost of drivers, which is what the post I was replying to said?
- nielsole 4y agoWhile number of crashes are likely getting reduced, head injuries to drivers may increase or be fatal.
- robbrown451 4y agoBecause the drivers are not wearing helmets and therefore increasing the risk to themselves.