4 ms·
26/30. Since 90%+ of images seem to be have been generated by a machine, a better challenge would be to pick which image was generated by a human from a gallery
by mkl95 4y ago
26/30. Since 90%+ of images seem to be have been generated by a machine, a better challenge would be to pick which image was generated by a human from a gallery of images.
- pimlottc 4y agoThat’s interesting, in my batch it seemed like 90% were from humans.
- gwd 4y agoIf you knew ahead of time that it was 50/50, then you could adjust your odds as you went on; i.e., on image 28, if there had been 14 CG ones and 13 human ones, you'd know a priori it had a 2/3 chance of being human. It would be nice if they told you in more detail how the algorithm worked. How well curated are the AI and human images? It seems like selecting the absolute best AI ones and the worst human ones would make it easy to make things look better than they really are. A genuinely "fair" way to do it I think would be this: 1. Randomly collect a few thousand images from DeviantArt 2. Ask people to write a short description of each image, similar to the prompts given to DALL-E 3. Generate DALL-E images from all the prompts Randomly show a human or AI image with 50% probability. That should give you a good measure of the actual state of the art.
- input_sh 4y agoI've tried the first time, then just restarted and voted machine every time. 30/30.