4 ms·
I mean that’s all still nonsense > I said they have the mountains of data to predict better. I said that there must be some reason why they are ignoring that d
by orf 4y ago
I mean that’s all still nonsense
> I said they have the mountains of data to predict better. I said that there must be some reason why they are ignoring that data
Are they ignoring their data? Says who?
I guess it’s more comfortable to your worldview to make several jumps:
1. The data must say Woke content sucks
2. Netflix must not be listening to this data
3. Something must be forcing them to ignore it (but hehehe I won’t say why I think that is!)
And pretend that it’s fact. The anti-woke agenda being pushed by the conservative media as a next-generation “roe vs wade” division point has no bearing on me and my country, so I don’t really care. It’s just funny and a bit sad to watch.
- lelanthran 4y ago> Are they ignoring their data? Says who? Well, the fact that they are following flops with flops is a good indicator. > I guess it’s more comfortable to your worldview to make several jumps: Ironically, the only person who made jumps here was you. All I'm doing is pointing out that they have to data to reduce the number of flops, and it isn't getting reduced, hence they must be ignoring that data. You are making the unwarranted conclusion that it's all down to pure chance. There is no evidence that that is true.
- femiagbabiaka 4y agoIf you feel strongly about this and have the empirical data to back it up, you should write about that data publicly, post it on HN, call for a shareholder suit. I feel strongly that this is all conspiracy, but of course that’s why we have the legal system and the concept of fiduciary duty.