3 ms·
> I build all my systems in serverless now > I'm actually to the point where I question someone's decision if they choose to use actual servers. These are the
by scollet 4y ago
> I build all my systems in serverless now
> I'm actually to the point where I question someone's decision if they choose to use actual servers.
These are the "Paid for by..." aspects of the comment, but I agree with the important part, which is where it stops:
> Serverless is a much more efficient use of resources and much more manageable than most companies can do on a low budget.
- throwaway2016a 4y ago> These are the "Paid for by..." Not sure I get your implication. I have no stake in any Serverless platforms. I've launched everything from bare metal to Kubernetes clusters in the last 20+ years. I honestly think it is a game changer. Sorry if I'm too enthusiastic about it that I sound like I'm biased. But unless your company is made of money and has tons of devops resources and/or you have a very specific use case, I believe it should be the default go-to. Edit: I know, my name has "throwaway" in it but check my karma. I didn't just come here to post serverless praise.
- scollet 4y agoAh, no I didn't mean it literally. That's why I had the quotes. It's an emulation. I'm invoking humor to contradict you because I disagree with you as the offerings stand, and as you staked so much (in the upstream) in relying on serverless. I think you left out the nuance of your experience.