4 ms·
Civil Forfeiture goes directly against Constitutional rights and protections. This article makes ridiculous excuses for the practice and in my opinion, the arti
by ratsmack 4y ago
Civil Forfeiture goes directly against Constitutional rights and protections. This article makes ridiculous excuses for the practice and in my opinion, the article is disregarded without consideration.
- vesinisa 4y agoIndeed. By common sense, civil forfeiture as it de facto occurs today is a clear violation of fundamental human rights. If an argument can be made that the process is compliant with some document supposedly enumerating fundamental rights of a person - such as the US constitution - either the argument or the document is flawed.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- giantg2 4y agoCivil law in general goes against constitutional protections. Most rights one has in a criminal case don't exist in the civil side.
- butlerm 4y agoThere is nothing civil about civil asset forfeiture. It is straight up robbery, about the most uncivil government action you can imagine short of rounding suspects up and shooting them.