4 ms·
Except it's not really a moral discussion, it's a legal one—and the most fundamental laws of the country obviously ban the tactic. The article uses a lot of so
by crooked-v 4y ago
Except it's not really a moral discussion, it's a legal one—and the most fundamental laws of the country obviously ban the tactic.
The article uses a lot of sophistry to try and argue that the plain and obvious intended reading of the Fourth Amendment isn't correct, and that's obviously nonsense, both in a vacuum and in the context of when and why it was written.
- SnowHill9902 4y agoLaws codify the underlying morality of a society so they are not divorced and independent one from the other. There may be a significant lag between both, though and at times one may lead the other.