> Assuming that's true Read the article for yourself, it skips right over the 1804 Haiti massacre, which reduced the French population from thousands to nearly

> Assuming that's true Read the article for yourself, it skips right over the 1804 Haiti massacre, which reduced the French population from thousands to nearly zero. In contemporary terminology, we call that a genocide. > Assuming that's true, it's good evidence that journalists should stick to journalism and stay out of writing history. Yeah, this isn't their first foray into politically motivated "historical" work. The 1619 Project somehow won a Pulitzer despite being widely panned by historians. This looks like more of the same.