I'm sorry, but there is no call to authority, the person is merely sharing something, and anonymity is a personal choice. As mentioned, the person in question w

I'm sorry, but there is no call to authority, the person is merely sharing something, and anonymity is a personal choice. As mentioned, the person in question works in a high position in finance, and should not be giving out details about operations and operations of business partners. Even if the practice is an open secret in cryptocurrency "investment groups", any kind of association to their person, their role or the (legal) operations themselves is to be avoided. It's also surprising to me that choosing anonymity would be scrutinized on Hacker News. What is being described here is not front-running.