15 ms·
For sure it's a terrible name (sorry, Jason ;P). In my other comment I talk about my experiences pitching this idea when I was https://web.dev https://web.dev c
by kaycebasques 4y ago
For sure it's a terrible name (sorry, Jason ;P). In my other comment I talk about my experiences pitching this idea when I was https://web.dev https://web.dev content lead. There's something about this word that is an immediate turnoff and prevents people from really looking deeply at it. Which is a shame because it's such a useful mental model.
Names are important!
- SOLAR_FIELDS 4y agoSometimes when going deep into a subject I have to pause and explain that it’s a very specific name for what we are talking about and while it may seem pedantic, Naming Things Is Actually Incredibly Important. IMO naming things properly is at least 25% of a good system design.
- webmaven 4y agoCould archetype/al/ical (or possibly prototypal) have been used instead? Both have associations with artefacts (usually authored and manufactured, respectively) rather than gathered specimens.