3 ms·
Time won’t flow back, but it was less than a decade ago that you replaced batteries by popping the phone’s back. I wouldn’t say Apple bears no blame in making 7
by makeitdouble 4y ago
Time won’t flow back, but it was less than a decade ago that you replaced batteries by popping the phone’s back. I wouldn’t say Apple bears no blame in making 79 pound tools necessary to replace a battery.
And as they basically opened that path for every other maker to follow and point at Apple as a justification, we really shouldn’t give them a pass.
- lupire 4y agoThose phones had smaller batteries/phone ratio due to the extra casing, which creates the waste of throwing away an extra (smaller) battery.
- makeitdouble 4y agoIs your argument that we currently don’t have the technology to have the phone’s screen and back enclosed hermetically in a reversible matter, while staying thin ? We’re also not arguing that no tool should be required, just not 79 pound ultra expensive ones. We have 3d stacked nm features processors, I would not see the above as an unsolvable problem, nor even a very hard one to be honest.