3 ms·
Apparently, new evidence discredits the idea that the site was built by hunter-gatherers: "New insights from several deep soundings excavated... have exposed t
by Emma_Goldman 4y ago
Apparently, new evidence discredits the idea that the site was built by hunter-gatherers:
"New insights from several deep soundings excavated... have exposed the weaknesses of the temple-narrative, meaning that a revision of the popular scientific view is now unavoidable (Fig. 1). Specifically, the latest observations relate to the existence of domestic buildings and the harvesting and distribution of rain-water at Göbekli Tepe."
https://publications.dainst.org/journals/efb/article/view/2596/7095 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/efb/article/view/25...
- kqr 4y agoNote that the dichotomy between "hunter-gatherers" and "permanently settled" is a bit overstated. - There's some evidence that various people in history have been seasonally permanently settled, and foraging without a fixed home part of the year. - Other people settle for a few years and then move on, doing small-scale growing of crops when they are settled. - Yet others encourage wild growth of food crops, and generally move around and forage in a large area that has been lightly tended to in that manner. (Meaning they don't build homes that last for centuries, but they also permanently inhabit a large area.) - And in some societies, there are classes of people that are permanently settled but live in symbiosis with more mobile foragers, who live in the permanent settlements only a little at a time.
- inglor_cz 4y agoYes, for example the Yanomamo hunters-gatherers in the Amazon basin stay in approximately one place for years or decades, in jungle clearings they build semi-permanent "shapoons", a structure from wood and leaves that obviously does not survive in the archeologic records (nothing survives in the Amazon; there is a lack of stone there and organic structures decompose soon), plus they cultivate a lot of plants locally. The concept of a hunter-gatherer roaming the endless steppe is romantic, but it does not seem to occur that much in known history.
- ComputerGuru 4y agoTFA itself talks about this, but not to disparage the hunter-gatherer aspect but rather to claim that there was an actual, ~permanently inhabited city here, that was still nevertheless pre-agrarian. That’s part of the mystery and importance of these sites: they upend what we thought we knew.