What is wrong with referring to the physical evidence? The bloody things are literally sticking up out of the ground. OK - not really "literally" unless the n

What is wrong with referring to the physical evidence? The bloody things are literally sticking up out of the ground. OK - not really "literally" unless the nobs have learned to write or have been written/drawn or I've messed my vowels and got litorally confused with literally (litor is shore as in seashore or river bank in Latin). Oh and they are not bloody either unless rubbed too hard. Nob, is of course: en_GB (slang) for an upper class person or a penis. Back to the article. This archaeological site seems to be extremely important. It seems to show that our ideas of when people started to put down roots ie build stuff and become fixed to a location (Latin - locus) started to happen earlier than we thought it did.