> They realized that the investigative journalism type of news was too costly and produced smaller returns compared to this type of lifestyle "news". That's be

> They realized that the investigative journalism type of news was too costly and produced smaller returns compared to this type of lifestyle "news". That's been true for a long time. Do you have any evidence of this decision at the NYT? > wokeism I think that words like that are inflammatory (as is well known). Could you use more specific language and is there evidence? I know that's repeated a a lot in a certain segment, but reptition has no relationship with truth - facts (sometimes from investigative reporters) do. Thus chemistry not alchemy.