> Yeah, I've read all the arguments about harm, and I just don't buy it. "I have no medical background whatsoever but I do not buy undisputed medical science."

> Yeah, I've read all the arguments about harm, and I just don't buy it. "I have no medical background whatsoever but I do not buy undisputed medical science." > I'd get a CT scan every year if I could convince someone to sign off on it 20mSv of unnecessary ionizing radiation exposure a year, what could possibly go wrong? That whole-body CT scan is equivalent to getting at least EIGHTY chest x-rays, and ten times what a uranium miner receives in a year, and well within the range where an increased risk of cancer is noticeable in epidemiological data. Case and point why this tool should not be generally available.