2 ms·
When the product is a car, which has a rate of 36,000 accidental deaths (I don't really care whether or not they are decapitations) per year just in the US, the
by fallingknife 4y ago
When the product is a car, which has a rate of 36,000 accidental deaths (I don't really care whether or not they are decapitations) per year just in the US, then your standard of "more than one is criminal negligence" is ridiculous.
- ModernMech 4y agoIt's not a matter of statistics, it's a matter of demonstrated product defects that have predictably lead to deaths, that Tesla refuses to fix, even though they know it's an issue. I hardly consider that an accidental death. As you said, it's well known the sensors on Teslas can't accommodate the target use case (Level 5 autonomy). And yet Tesla won't admit this. That's what makes this negligent. Imagine if it were your loved one who died in a Tesla using a technology that Tesla knew or should have known to be deficient and intentionally oversold its capabilities. Would you shrug and point to industry statistics? Or would you be mad at Tesla? Be honest. Frankly, the attitude that Tesla should be allowed to test their beta-quality products on public roads (I certainly didn't agree to participate in the beta test) is what I find to be ridiculous.