> The CFAA is broad and shitty. Good, then we're in agreement on my basic point: that the CFAA is bad law. That means the best way to fix the root problem with

> The CFAA is broad and shitty. Good, then we're in agreement on my basic point: that the CFAA is bad law. That means the best way to fix the root problem with the CFAA is to repeal it because it's bad law, not try to patch it. As I have pointed out at various points in this overall thread, we already have laws against fraud. All we need to do is apply them to fraud committed using computers. We don't need a whole new set of laws just for fraud committed with computers. > At this point I don't think you even know what you're trying to say Sure I do. I just said it again above.