3 ms·
I suppose you're right but working on a compiler/language has made me very wary of "But what about embedded!" as a technical point. You can basically argue any
by mhh__ 4y ago
I suppose you're right but working on a compiler/language has made me very wary of "But what about embedded!" as a technical point. You can basically argue any point using embedded.
- AlotOfReading 4y agoThat's a totally fair objection and one I'm sensitive to as a vocal advocate for moving ES teams away from the custom crap that we've spent the past 40 years doing. I still think the weird limitations you get from "what about embedded" are often just obvious canaries for problems present throughout much of the vast diversity of computing. For example, sampling profilers used to have serious issues on WSL (where perf must still be manually compiled) and WINE. Having instrumentation hooks also makes things like AFL and custom sanitizers possible. The flexibility isn't always reasonable (e.g. don't assume little endian, don't assume 8-bit bytes), but there may be valid use cases that weren't considered at the toolchain/language level.