3 ms·
Right, and I think they missed some major opportunities as a result. Would be great to have an offering as the basic base image for docker containers (outside
by tempnow987 4y ago
Right, and I think they missed some major opportunities as a result.
Would be great to have an offering as the basic base image for docker containers (outside of UBI).
They let Project Atomic die.
Then they let CoreOS Container Linux die I think?
They have a Fedore CoreOS but don't seem to promote it at all and I can't find images on docker hub for it.
The RedHat stuff is generally paywalled. CentOS is gone.
I know they are pitching the IBM cloud - I don't care about the IBM cloud - though they keep on advertising Watson to me as the solution to every issue.
The OpenShift brand was hurt by the enormous mess of complexity it was compared to K8 and things like ECS and Fargate etc.
- dralley 4y agoProject Atomic and CoreOS Container Linux both became Fedora CoreOS. Neither really "died", they were just folded together into a new effort. Fedora Silverblue is also comparable to Project Atomic for the traditional non-container installed OS scenario.