3 ms·
I see three points in your post: 1. You want to tell something 'unrelated to this topic'. That's a bad idea because it clutters our discussions. I assume you h
by snickerer 4y ago
I see three points in your post:
1.
You want to tell something 'unrelated to this topic'. That's a bad idea because it clutters our discussions. I assume you have some inner pressure and strong emotions about the windmill topic and want to release it.
2.
You're picking on city people. They don't notice the decrease of forests because they don't see it when they look out of the window?
3.
You are telling us that the decline of the forests in Germany are caused by… windmills? Really? That's so wrong that I don't know where to start to explain.
I don't know where the hatred against windmills or against 'city people' comes from. But its origin is certainly not windmills.
We need the windmills to fight the decline of the forests, you know. And to fight mass extinction. We need the windmills to avert the demise of many species. Including our own.
- rad_gruchalski 4y ago1. Yes, I know the rules here. 2. Yes. 3. No, I‘m saying that forest is being removed for windmills. You are assuming that I‘m having some dumb argument. This is what I see where I live. Windmills in a national park with more trees removed for service roads. But please, continue educating.
- yladiz 4y agoProve it. Please, educate us all with facts about putting windmills and cutting trees in a national park.