3 ms·
The right of the people to be secure in their ... effects, against unreasonable ... seizures, shall not be violated The building was part of the person's effec
by alistairSH 4y ago
The right of the people to be secure in their ... effects, against unreasonable ... seizures, shall not be violated
The building was part of the person's effects. I don't understand how your argument is legal (not that I don't believe you - civil forfeiture has been going on long enough that I assume SCOTUS has heard a sampling of cases).
It beggars belief that this practice has stood for decades.
- mysterydip 4y agoI agree with you and think it's a crazy practice. I was just saying how they justify it (flaws aside)