4 ms·
The idea is absolutely not the same. She didn't want her Instagram back because she's addicted to insta as a user. She wanted it back because her social media p
by wutbrodo 4y ago
The idea is absolutely not the same. She didn't want her Instagram back because she's addicted to insta as a user. She wanted it back because her social media presence is part of the business she runs.
The analogue here is the casting couch, sans the implication that it's sprung unexpectedly on her.
- throwaway0a5e 4y agoThe hand wringing that you're implying with the casting couch analogy doesn't really follow since she's already engaged in that line of work. This is like giving the right people free promotional <whatever it is you make> because your booth got kicked out of the craft fair for a dumb reason.
- wutbrodo 4y agoWhat hand-wringing? I even went out of my way to exclude the removal of agency implied by the term casting couch.
- robonerd 4y ago> She didn't want her Instagram back because she's addicted to insta as a user. She wanted it back because her social media presence is part of the business she runs. Are you sure there is a clear-cut line between the two? Which was she first, a sex worker or a habitual social media user? If she was first a social media addict, then it seems conceivable that she found this line of work because it was adjacent to social media, a straight forward way to turn her social media addiction into a job.
- gigatexal 4y agoTons of OnlyFans creators have funnel accounts like this on Twitter. Having such an account on Instagram is playing with fire.