3 ms·
Understood, I'm not saying it's not generally useful, I'm specifically talking about this implementation; is the way it was built useful, does it actually solve
by francislavoie 4y ago
Understood, I'm not saying it's not generally useful, I'm specifically talking about this implementation; is the way it was built useful, does it actually solve user's rate limiting needs? We need people to try to the plugin so we can mould it to user's needs. Then later we can bundle it once we're sure it's designed properly and we're locked-in on the approach taken.
- heurisko 4y agoIndeed, I see where you are coming from. However I wonder if it would work better if the module were brought under the Caddy namespace and marked "beta". At least then, there would be a show of commitment for the idea, if not the implementation. Recently I've been looking at the Symfony framework, and this is how they introduce features, with a clear warning that the API etc. is subject to change.