Here's a post I wrote on Julia discourse about why one-based indexing is not the culprit here, no matter what people may feel about it aesthetically: https://di

Here's a post I wrote on Julia discourse about why one-based indexing is not the culprit here, no matter what people may feel about it aesthetically: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/offsetarrays-inbounds-and-confusion/81295/15 https://discourse.julialang.org/t/offsetarrays-inbounds-and-.... Several of the most serious scientifically minded programming languages have also had arrays that can be indexed starting at different offsets, including Fortran, Chapel and Fortress. If Julia were zero-based OffsetArrays would still exist and be highly useful. OffsetArrays is not some "kludge" just to allow indexing from zero. Frankly, indexing from zero isn't improtant enough for that. What really makes OffsetArrays useful is being able to do things like have indices go from -k:k where k may depend on the particular dimension. That way the point A[0, 0, 0] is the center of the array and you can navigate up/down/back from there naturally. Of course you can simulate that with arrays that arrays that start at zero or one, but it's a major pain.