3 ms·
Maybe now. But years ago, that's not how it was advertised. As shared by others in this thread: From Tesla: "Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars" followed
by jasonlotito 4y ago
Maybe now. But years ago, that's not how it was advertised. As shared by others in this thread:
From Tesla:
"Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars"
followed by:
"All Tesla vehicles produced in our factory, including Model 3, have the hardware needed for full self-driving capability at a safety level substantially greater than that of a human driver."
Self-driving cars doesn't sound like fancy name for cruise control.
That's from Tesla. Who has already faced consequences for lying in marketing.
- manuelabeledo 4y agoRight. I believe that they did market it like a proper safety feature in the past, absolutely capable of avoiding crashes. Also, the name is already misleading, as "Autopilot" suggests that the car actually "drives" itself to some extent. Even if they weren't trying to mislead people in their marketing materials, these points seem enough to make a case.
- soheil 4y ago> that's not how it was advertised What are you talking about? When was the last time you saw a Tesla advertisement? > Self-driving cars doesn't sound like fancy name for cruise control Having the hardware or the capacity to be a self-driving car is not equal to being a self-driving car. The hardware must be enabled, which in this case wasn't. The car only had Autopilot not FSD. Please learn the difference.