4 ms·
I mean it's page one in any "Good programmer" book: use descriptive names. Even programming has lots of this sort of shorthand going on going on. You probably
by dagw 4y ago
I mean it's page one in any "Good programmer" book: use descriptive names.
Even programming has lots of this sort of shorthand going on going on. You probably use several of them every day without really thinking about it. We write "def" instead of "define", "struct" instead of "structure", "var" instead of "variable", "mut" instead of "mutable", "puts" instead of "put_string", "std::vector" instead of "standard_library::vector", and you can probably think of 50 more if you put your mind to it. I'm sure even you have named a loop index variable "i" or "idx" at some point. Are you also advocating we change all of these to make them more descriptive?
- nh23423fefe 4y agodemands for accessibility always try to smuggle in the idea that X is impenetrable to newcomers. who cares. I dont care about newcomers. i dont care what they think is hard. if they are any good they will get over it and find out what is actually difficult with programming. people with no sway or impact dont get to scream confusion and force the competent to alter anything.