3 ms·
Seems a simple way would be that people who have assets seized should get the greater of a) $20k OR b) 3x the value of items seized AND c) attorneys fees At le
by _uy6i 4y ago
Seems a simple way would be that people who have assets seized should get the greater of a) $20k OR b) 3x the value of items seized AND c) attorneys fees
At least this allows 1) people to litigate smaller seizures 2) creates disincentives for the more abusive cases
- engineer_22 4y agoI appreciate that you're offering a solution. I think the proposal would put the burden on tax-payers.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoAs it should be if the public wants the assets sized. Someone should have to pay for the collateral policy damage. It seems that the burden should to those who voted for the policy opposed the innocent victims.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]