3 ms·
Maybe it'd be better if our society reprioritized so "these organizations are all amoral actors who exist for no other purpose except to fatten the wallets of t
by UncleMeat 4y ago
Maybe it'd be better if our society reprioritized so "these organizations are all amoral actors who exist for no other purpose except to fatten the wallets of their owners" isn't the assumed norm.
- chitowneats 4y agoYes, of course. They should exist for the purpose of advancing things that u/UncleMeat finds important instead. \s
- UncleMeat 4y agoClearly I shouldn't be the arbiter of world priorities, but I think there is something horribly fatalistic about people defending corporations as amoral entities as some sort of immutable property of the universe.
- nebulous_two 4y agoWhy is it only when things go bad that people realize that human priorities are not the same as company priorities?
- formerkrogemp 4y agoPerhaps the sarcasm here was not understood? Corporations should exist to serve people, broadly. Not the other way around. People over profit. We should all strive to be kinder as well where possible.
- pmyteh 4y agoPoe's Law, sadly. I've seen people sincerely argue exactly that case :-/