3 ms·
I imagine that this display is merely a proof of concept. There aren't many electronic devices that use displays of that size, but perhaps 6.1" was the smallest
by icki 15y ago
I imagine that this display is merely a proof of concept. There aren't many electronic devices that use displays of that size, but perhaps 6.1" was the smallest that Toshiba could scale a 1600p display.
Or perhaps the electronics required to produce such dense pixels are still quite large, and whose rectangular dimensions wouldn't allow for displays of the same density without a wide bezel.
- Too 15y agoWhat's the proof of concept with high res screens, they've been around for some time, just not in any consumer products. I saw some 1280*1024 2" screens several years ago. From texas instruments, i think its main use was in projectors, i don't know if it could have been used for displays but from the demo it looked exatly as an lcd but semi-transparent. 6" sounds pretty optimal for e-books i would say. ipad is too big and smartphones are too small. This is also where there is good reason to have such high res.