3 ms·
> He mentions that axial forces are taken into account If he does, he's not included it in his theory paper. Take a look, there is no mention of "axial forces"
by DougBTX 18y ago
> He mentions that axial forces are taken into account
If he does, he's not included it in his theory paper. Take a look, there is no mention of "axial forces" or "deflection" in the paper.
In equation 7, he calculates the thrust T using only the difference in propagation velocity at each plate, but makes no mention of how the propagation velocity changes. If he did, it would be obvious that you have to account for radiation pressure on all sides on the tube, not just sides which happen to be perpendicular to the tube's axis.
> efficiency in the conversion from electrical energy to momentum
The efficiency will be about 0%, so no need to worry.
- nazgulnarsil 18y agoyou're right. in the paper he is simply doing F2-F1 to give the thrust without any mention of the surface area of the cone walls. he mentions constructing the cone to give a "reflection free transmission" which is impossible. i guess junk science is right. oh well. from page 6: Note that the reflection-free interface, with matched wave impedances , will ensure no forces are produced at the interface. <-- that doesn't sound possible.