3 ms·
> Mostly the US, with some UK mixed in. That's the opposition to Russia? Hardly, Ukraine's neighbours are doing far more than anyone in London or Washington.
by namdnay 4y ago
> Mostly the US, with some UK mixed in.
That's the opposition to Russia? Hardly, Ukraine's neighbours are doing far more than anyone in London or Washington.
> They are definitely not the same, they have obviously different values
Yes one of them is democracy, the other is dictatorships. One is good, the other is bad. Refreshingly, some things in life are simple.
> he's the one fighting for a multi-polar world with multi-polar values
if he wanted a multi-polar world he'd have let ukraine be a pole. no, he wants a russian world, with himself at the top of it
- paganel 4y agoAgain, the Russians have said as much what they want. What they understand by "multi-polar world" is the US (and its allies), Russia, China, maybe India, maybe some other regional thingie, like South America/Mercosur maybe (I think by this point they're already branding the EU under "US and its allies", that wasn't always the case, especially around 2003-2005 when Germany and France were against the US intervention in Iraq). Yes, they would want Ukraine under their sphere of influence, that one has been also made pretty clear by them ever since the USSR was broken up.
- ImPostingOnHN 4y agothat sounds like both a bad idea, and an unrealistic idea, most of all because in that presentation russia considers itself an equal to the others in the list, which it most certainly is not, in nearly all respects in a more generalized sense, russia actually doesn't care about any of the countries listed but itself, except insofar as it can convince those countries to support russia the world is already multipolar, as was pointed out – look to the UN for an example of how multiple poles interact with each other in a civilized fashion – nearly 200 of them! russia doesn't want this, all they want is domination, and the disintegration of the multipolar world that is civilized diplomacy which might unite and thus present a united front against russian domination and genocide
- BuyMyBitcoins 4y ago>”the world is already multipolar, as was pointed out – look to the UN for an example of how multiple poles interact with each other in a civilized fashion – nearly 200 of them!” This isn’t what polarity refers to. The nations of the UN are not at all equal in terms of power and influence. While no one would question that the United States, Russia, and China are the “poles” in this system, no one would regard any of the 190ish other nations which are far smaller and less powerful as poles.
- alexvoda 4y agoIn the UN the nations are more equal than anywhere else. At tha General Assembly all nations are equal. And after all of the abuses of veto powers discussions to eliminate the permanent Security Council positions are once again picking up steam.