> What nobody understands is that this is not happening strictly because of the war or the drought, but because of the fragility of the global food system, whic

> What nobody understands is that this is not happening strictly because of the war or the drought, but because of the fragility of the global food system, which simply cannot bear any shocks. Your logic seems strange: "he didn't die because of a car crash, he died because his car didn't resist being smashed into a tree" Sure, any system could be made more or less fragile, and you could argue that making it less fragile would have lessened the impact, but you can't say that "this is not happening because of the war" - of course it is