The case law is that the "successor" company in an acquisition is still held by all the same union obligations as before an acquisition [1]. So the folks in the

The case law is that the "successor" company in an acquisition is still held by all the same union obligations as before an acquisition [1]. So the folks in the Glitch union keep their bargaining unit and keep their contract. Many union contracts also have an explicit "successor clause" too, although I don't know about the Glitch union contract. [1] https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/the-law/bargaining-in-good-faith-with-employees-union-representative https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/the-law/ba...