4 ms·
Just because people do something doesn’t mean they should. In that, I focus on what you might call ethics. But as for the legality aspect: Through most of the
by chrismorgan 4y ago
Just because people do something doesn’t mean they should.
In that, I focus on what you might call ethics. But as for the legality aspect:
Through most of the civilised world (at a minimum, those that I know of definitely: AU, NZ, all EU, UK, CA), sending unsolicited commercial messages at all is illegal, with very little in the way of exception or subtlety. The USA’s CAN-SPAM Act is the outlier, unusually permissive, by being largely opt-out rather than opt-in like everyone else. (And frankly it’s not at all uncommon for the USA to be an outlier in a bad way among first-world countries.)
And taking the legality aspects further, it’s common for people to ignore restrictive laws that aren’t being particularly seriously enforced, and spam legislation is often like that around the globe. Just because lots of people are doing it doesn’t even mean it’s legal.
- traceroute66 4y agoI agree, in the civilised world, UCE is spam and there is little to no scope for "grey areas". For example, the ICO (UK) has the following to say: You must be very careful before using bought-in lists for recorded calls, texts or emails. You can only use them if all the people on the list specifically consented to receive that type of message from you. Generic consent covering any third party will not be enough.[1] [1] https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-pecr/electronic-and-telephone-marketing/using-marketing-lists/ https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-pecr/electroni...