4 ms·
The chart is obviously misleading. More volume would mean fewer deaths PER miles driven, but this is showing absolute numbers of deaths for ONLY electric models
by BluSyn 4y ago
The chart is obviously misleading. More volume would mean fewer deaths PER miles driven, but this is showing absolute numbers of deaths for ONLY electric models. Volvo has many more models besides EVs. The chart would be fair if all models were included, and if it was relative to road usage, eg. deaths per 100k miles driven.
- magicCat 4y agothere are direct model to model comparisons with sales numbers in the article. And other manufactures ev sales numbers do not seem to to be off by a factor of 100 too 200 compared to tesla
- ec109685 4y agoTesla’s delivery numbers are wrong. No sources listed either.
- magicCat 4y agofair, the numbers seem to be off according do the numbers i can find. Tesla produced more cars then that by a factor of 2x even in q1 2021
- happyopossum 4y agoSingle year sales numbers, but for some reason the author used total deaths instead of single year deaths.
- kareemsabri 4y agoThe chart does not say it is using only electric models. How do you know that? It says per BRAND not per model. Further down, the article includes deaths relative to sales volume for various EV models. I don't see how it is unfair to compare two EVs fatality rates. Finally, while miles driven would be great I imagine it's hard to know the average miles driven per model, but there's little reason to think it differs by orders of magnitude.