3 ms·
>Democratic governments represent the will of the people Such as the will of the people for pot to remain technically illegal throughout the entire nation, or
by notch656a 4y ago
>Democratic governments represent the will of the people
Such as the will of the people for pot to remain technically illegal throughout the entire nation, or the will of the people for a president to be elected with a minority vote?
>Would you for example say that guns are clearly anti-government or pro-government?
Neither. Guns are a tool usable by a variety of actors for a variety of purposes. Banning guns (or restricting them in a way that isn't restricted to the government such as implementing a burdensome taxation scheme for automatic weapons or short barreled rifles/shotguns) in non-government hands is firmly pro-government, however. Banning guns for 'felons' who are only that way because they are enemies of the state (such as pot dealers or someone who 'vandalized' a government owned wall with a work of art a la California felony vandalism laws) is firmly pro-government.
- datadata 4y ago> Neither. Guns are a tool usable by a variety of actors for a variety of purposes. Agree. Now replace guns with crypto and this is basically my position. There is obviously nuance for this kind of classification for any technology.
- notch656a 4y agoPoint taken, and agreed. I do think governments will eventually turn against (at least anonymized like XMR) crypto, the same way they turned against bearer bonds/shares. Governments in the past 50 years have been extremely resistant to bearer-like certificates with extraordinarily high value density.