3 ms·
> but is it power in = water out, plus a bunch of facility maintenance and operations? Basically yes. I'm mostly familiar with Reverse Osmosis, where electric
by invalidator 4y ago
> but is it power in = water out, plus a bunch of facility maintenance and operations?
Basically yes. I'm mostly familiar with Reverse Osmosis, where electricity to drive the pumps is about 40% of the TCO. There's another big chunk for consumables - chemicals, failed membranes, etc. Then the rest is capital costs to build the thing.
It's not "free power == free water", but the power is a significant factor.
> Desalination will be the new pumped hydro.
Eh, no. Desal is a great place to dump surplus energy, but you can't get the energy back out. It pairs well with nuclear power, so you can use extra nighttime capacity. It's less useful with solar, unless you've severely overbuilt panels and can't find anything else to do with them on sunny days. It's a better tradeoff to buy fewer panels and use that money to pay for storage (pumped hydro, batteries, whatever).
- sbierwagen 4y agoFun fact: the Mangyshlak atomic energy complex used low temperature steam from the first stage turbines for thermal desalination: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/29/067/29067742.pdf https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/...
- ncmncm 4y agoNothing pairs well with nuclear. A key fact about desalination is that it is totally OK for it to happen only when the sun shines or the wind blows.
- RangerScience 4y agoNeat, thanks for the additional details! My mind went "you can't do pumped hydro if you don't have enough water!" Although I guess you could just pump salt water, and we're not gonna run out of that.