4 ms·
When the government goes soft on crime, you need to look deeper to find the truth about matters. And make no mistake, it has gone soft in some places. I would
by voakbasda 4y ago
When the government goes soft on crime, you need to look deeper to find the truth about matters. And make no mistake, it has gone soft in some places. I would pay extra to have a background check turn up everything it can, so I can make my own determination.
- lovich 4y agoI still think that’s not something you’d want to have come back from a government background check. As long as they they are dutifully reporting the truth of the matter in terms of how the government ruled on the case then that seems like enough. What your describing sounds like it should stay out of government hands just on an ethical basis
- ravel-bar-foo 4y agoThe employer is asking for a background check to minimize losses/insurance payments due to employee theft. If the government background check does not reflect the risk of the individual being involved in theft in the past (for whatever reason), then the employer will find another, perhaps even less ethical provider of information to assess the risk.