4 ms·
Submit the evidence to them! I know some friends who work in dictionaries, and they are more than happy to do revisions on things like earliest printed usage of
by afry1 4y ago
Submit the evidence to them! I know some friends who work in dictionaries, and they are more than happy to do revisions on things like earliest printed usage of a word, and people frequently do write in providing exactly that kind of evidence.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/contact-us https://www.merriam-webster.com/contact-us
Seeing as this one was so easily googlable, the following point will seem a bit silly, but the research performed by dictionary editors is only as good as the source material they can get their hands on. There may very well be earlier documented usages of many words that they define, but if they can't find those earlier usages ... well, the oldest usage at hand is the one that gets documented.
- TedDoesntTalk 4y agoBitrot appears in their 1998 or 1999 list. Very wrong. That term is much much older.
- vaylian 4y agoYes. But you still need a credible source for that. "Don’t believe everything you read on the Internet" — Abraham Lincoln
- TedDoesntTalk 4y agoNot really. I don’t care if anyone believes it or not.