3 ms·
if you'd read the previous post carefully, you'd have seen they said that
by gjvc 4y ago
if you'd read the previous post carefully, you'd have seen they said that
- factcheckdec 4y agoDid their clarification truly merit such a snarky response?
- gjvc 4y agoit wasn't clarification; it was repetition
- hombre_fatal 4y agoNo, the comment did make it sound like it was PG’s resilience that saved the data. In fact that seems to be the whole point of the comment. So the snark does seem out of place and the clarification useful.
- gjvc 4y agonice bit of white-knighting there
- lelanthran 4y ago> nice bit of white-knighting there Is it really constructive to throw insults[1]? I explained myself above, after all. [1] I had to look it up to see what it means: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_knight https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_knight. Since we aren't in a business context, I can only assume that you think I am female :-)
- lelanthran 4y ago> if you'd read the previous post carefully, you'd have seen they said that I did read it carefully (and quoted the whole thing for context), but that final line made it seem that it was PG that was responsible for that particular instance of resilience. Someone who isn't familiar with how ext3/4 handles deletes might, from the comment alone, assume that the same sort of thing would happen on other filesystems.