4 ms·
Well, Turing explicitly formulated it as a _game_, and for a game to be meaningful, players have to understand rules and have a desire to win. And given that th
by killerstorm 4y ago
Well, Turing explicitly formulated it as a _game_, and for a game to be meaningful, players have to understand rules and have a desire to win. And given that the question was "Can machines think?", a human playing the game should have a good thinking ability.
Game with bored, disinterested players would be entirely meaningless.
- gopher_space 4y agoIt's looking more like "how can I tell if I'm talking to a machine unless the potential person on the other end is strapped into a torture chair and forced to respond rationally to my inane philosophical ramblings." And I'd like it more as a Gedankenexperiment if people weren't talking about it as a tool or metric. That kind of thinking gains momentum.