3 ms·
Absolutely. And they never cloaked it in faux-objective reportage of the sort that Judith Miller and her ilk rammed down the throats of American newspaper read
by jfb 15y ago
Absolutely. And they never cloaked it in faux-objective reportage of the sort that Judith Miller and her ilk rammed down the throats of American newspaper readers under the guise of "just the facts, ma'am" style journalism.
The Economist has repudiated its support for the war; has the Times repudiated theirs?
- Swannie 15y agoExactly. I remember reading an article from an outgoing editor of The Economist. He said there was an unwritten rule: 80% fact, 20% opinion, but that opinion should be clearly stated as such. I usually find the opinions quite easy to notice and consider apart from the facts.