4 ms·
They wouldn't have had a pricing problem if they would've went with a powerful ARM chip from the beginning, like say Nvidia's quad core Tegra 3, which handles b
by nextparadigms 15y ago
They wouldn't have had a pricing problem if they would've went with a powerful ARM chip from the beginning, like say Nvidia's quad core Tegra 3, which handles browsing quite well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yab7mv9yOm8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yab7mv9yOm8
- joshu 15y agoGiven that it doesn't run any external binaries, they still could?
- nextparadigms 15y agoI know they could and they probably will, but what I'm saying is that it could be too late. They had to make a first impression with Chromebooks and they blew it, in big part because of the pricing. They did the very same mistake with the Google TV Revue that was also powered by Atom and cost $300, while the ARM-based Apple TV was $100. And it seems they still haven't learned their lesson, now making all future Android versions optimized for Atom.