4 ms·
It's not just OSI. Debian, FSF, etc. all don't see that as free software specifically because it restricts the ways that you can use the software - thereby defe
by cweagans 4y ago
It's not just OSI. Debian, FSF, etc. all don't see that as free software specifically because it restricts the ways that you can use the software - thereby defeating the point of having the source code in the first place.
That's no different than some EULA saying you can't do xyz with this software without purchasing a $xxx,xxx license from the vendor or whatever: it's the same effect. It's an artificial boundary put in place that restricts the user from doing something.
I don't find that particular view "esoteric" and I'm curious about why you do.
- righttoolforjob 4y agoExactly. It is fine to call it "source available" or something.