3 ms·
I think it's wrong of course to monitor adult children like this under any circumstances. The only thing I'd add though is I'd guess many of the kids expect the
by version_five 4y ago
I think it's wrong of course to monitor adult children like this under any circumstances. The only thing I'd add though is I'd guess many of the kids expect their parents will still pay for their university, car, etc. There is a "their's no such thing as a free lunch" lesson embedded somewhere. It's super shitty of the parents and no doubt destroying their relationship with the kids and probably creating all sorts of emotional problems for them. But the kids (who are adults) could also choose to stop being dependent on their parents if they prioritize independence.
- quantified 4y agoThese parents would be happy living in Oceana, I guess. Their kids will build it.
- dmm 4y agoYour parents income( really expected family contribution) is used to calculate your financial aid eligibility. This would make it really hard for many students to choose to stop being dependent.
- Zircom 4y agoThe kids could also just ditch their phones and learn to live without them for a few hours when they wanna leave campus. Or buy a cheapo used one and use WhatsApp/Messenger off WiFi if they need to communicate with friends. Not that I'm saying the parents doing this are in the right, just that it's pretty easily defeated IMO. Kids have been sneaking around behind their parents back since the beginning of civilization doing things they wouldn't approve of, this is just the next step really
- Slow_Hand 4y agoI agree. It's ironic then that the unexpected effect of this solution is that now these young people are arguably less safe because without their phones they are A) more likely to get lost or wander away from safe areas and B) They cannot call for help in an actual emergency.
- cwmma 4y agoThat was actually addressed in the article with a parent noting that a hike the kid went on didn't show up in the app.