3 ms·
Your answer is in deep conspiracy territory. The reality is in my opinion more banal: money. Microsoft and particularly Apple used to make cutting edge (at the
by jonathanstrange 4y ago
Your answer is in deep conspiracy territory. The reality is in my opinion more banal: money.
Microsoft and particularly Apple used to make cutting edge (at the time) TTS available as a marketing gimmick, but then did not develop this further because TTS was only relevant for screen readers and people with impaired vision weren't really their primary customers. Then TTS made advances and companies started selling high quality voices at high price points. Now companies want to make as much money with it as they can. Improving "free" TTS for ordinary customers is not really a top priority of Microsoft and Apple. Moreover, since network speeds have increased, any improved end-consumer TTS will send the text to a server and the audio back, so that a company can collect and analyze all the texts and make money with this spy data. That's how Google's free TTS server works.
- ccbccccbbcccbb 4y ago> Now companies want to make as much money with it as they can. That's exactly what I meant when I wrote "...strive to keep the status quo of being way beyond the capabilities of the people". Monopolizing the means of maximizing the profits to maximize the power - now that's some deep conspiracy territory, indeed.
- guerrilla 4y ago> Your answer is in deep conspiracy territory. The reality is in my opinion more banal: money. Honestly, are those really different? How is it not in their interest for money?
- ccbccccbbcccbb 4y agoCan't expect any honesty here, my friend. Vested interest and latent stockholm syndrom prevails.