4 ms·
Yea, it's paraphrasing. But it's still a terrible way to write. Bello's version even contradicts itself giving 8 AD as the beginning of plagiarism, not the orig
by sacrosancty 4y ago
Yea, it's paraphrasing. But it's still a terrible way to write. Bello's version even contradicts itself giving 8 AD as the beginning of plagiarism, not the origin of the word. That's what happens when you paraphrase by reshuffling the words instead of creating new writing from the information that's in your head.
- drakonka 4y agoParaphrasing can for sure be a very common form of plagiarism[0][1] [0] https://www.scribbr.com/frequently-asked-questions/is-paraphrasing-considered-plagiarism/ https://www.scribbr.com/frequently-asked-questions/is-paraph... [1] https://law-richmond.libguides.com/c.php?g=998384&p=7227189 https://law-richmond.libguides.com/c.php?g=998384&p=7227189
- jjeaff 4y agoIt doesn't seem like paraphrasing to me. I can imagine two people writing about this same topic coming up with both of those examples independently. Bello's paragraph includes specifics that aren't even in the supposed source.